Changes are inherently neutral – in other words, neither good nor bad. A bias in one direction or another will be felt only by those who are impacted by the change. And so it is perspective that drives the evaluation of a change. From the perspective of the person who initiates the change, the need for it and its benefits are clear. Those who are confronted with the change sometimes do not immediately recognize its added value and objective. For acceptance, it is crucial to explain that the change is a good thing, and why. To be able to do so, the respective rights and expectations of the parties involved must be recognized, formulated, considered and incorporated. Since: Those who are able to help shape the result themselves will stand behind it and identify themselves with the new situation.
We should consider this simple formula in healthcare IT, where changes – be they in software or new legislative projects – are constantly taking place. This is equally applicable for corporations and for health facilities. But above all for the persons acting directly on the patient. That's why it's so important for us to deal with changes transparently while setting joint goals and starting off all parties involved at the point he or she has reached relative to his or her respective role. And to do so in the best case, so that everyone recognizes the objective of the change, is able to cooperate actively in shaping it and wants it, or in short: "burns" for it.